COMMENTARY
Commentary. If you believe such a policy is discriminatory, do you think the discrimination is "overt and conscious." Under existing law, a policy that is "overtly" and "consciously" discriminatory is justified if and only if an employer can show that the discrimination is based on a "bona fide occupational qualification." Is being a man a genuine occupational qualification for jobs with high exposure levels to lead? Is protecting the health and safety of third parties, such as the unborn fetus, a proper concern of the company? What about the company's concern that unless some such policy is put into place the company may be liable for potential, defectively born, children of women employees?
This case, adapted from a recent decision made by the United States Supreme Court in 1991 (International Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls) , and cases like it, serve as useful points of departure for an exploration of what we mean by the phrase "equality between the sexes" and what such a phrase means under our Constitution and our laws.
In 1993, the Citadel, South Carolina's all-male military academy accepted and then rejected Shannon Faulkner, a female high-school student. Faulkner filed suit against the Citadel alleging that the military academy's policy of excluding women violated her right to equal protection under our laws.
Back to top

|